- US attack on Iran launched under Operation Epic Fury after intense White House briefings.
- Officials warned of potential heavy US casualties and regional retaliation.
- Trump framed the mission as a long-term geopolitical shift in US favor.
New Delhi: The US attack on Iran Operation Epic Fury was preceded by stark warnings and high-level intelligence briefings that outlined both severe risks and sweeping strategic gains. According to U.S. officials speaking anonymously, President Donald Trump was presented with a “high-risk, high-reward” scenario that could reshape the Middle East in Washington’s favor.
The Pentagon’s operation marked one of the most consequential military escalations in the region in decades.
Inside Operation Epic Fury
The Pentagon described the strikes as Operation Epic Fury, targeting multiple Iranian sites in coordination with Israeli forces. The action triggered retaliatory missile attacks by Iran against Israel and Gulf Arab states, plunging the region into heightened instability.
Trump acknowledged the gravity of the decision in a televised address, stating that American service members’ lives could be lost but calling the mission “noble” and future-focused.
Intelligence Briefings and Risk Assessment
Before authorizing the strikes, Trump reportedly received detailed briefings from senior national security officials, including John Ratcliffe, Dan Caine, Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth
Additionally, Admiral Brad Cooper traveled to Washington to participate in Situation Room discussions.
Officials warned of possible Iranian missile strikes on U.S. bases, proxy attacks in Iraq and Syria, and the limits of US air defense systems despite a significant military buildup.
A Once-in-a-Generation Gamble?
One official described the proposed operation as a rare opportunity for geopolitical transformation. The briefings suggested that, despite the risks, the moment could alter the balance of power in the Middle East.
However, experts cautioned against assuming predictable outcomes. Nicole Grajewski of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace noted that internal opposition movements within Iran remain fragmented, making regime change uncertain.
Also Read | Jammu Kashmir protest over Khamenei killing after Israel US strike on Iran
The US attack on Iran represents the most significant military gamble since the 2003 Iraq invasion. While the administration positioned the move as preemptive and strategic, analysts warn that retaliatory escalation remains possible.
The White House has not issued additional comments, and the Pentagon declined to provide further operational details.
Operation Epic Fury underscores the volatile calculus behind modern military intervention balancing potential strategic advantage against unpredictable regional fallout and significant human cost.
You May Like
Trending Searches Today |
- Antonio Guterres to Attend 18th BRICS Summit in Delhi
- Tamil Nadu to Withdraw Protest Cases Against Farmers, Teachers
- Odisha PUCC Fine Cut to Rs 6,000 for Vehicle Owners
- CJP Protest FIRs to Be Withdrawn, Says J P Nadda
- 100-Year-Old Hindu Temple Demolished in Pakistan’s Narowal
Amazon Online Shopping
